The DLP clause that nobody read for ten years is now being read.
Network Data Loss Prevention and Discovery Data Loss Prevention have always been priced separately, but the clause that defines what counts against each entitlement was rarely audited. Through 2025 and into 2026 that has changed. Audit notices into the DLP installed base are running ahead of the rest of the Symantec portfolio. Buyers who have not mapped current deployment against the licensing definition tend to discover the gap when the notice arrives.
ProxySG has the opposite problem. The hardware is end of life on a published schedule, and the renewal cycle is increasingly priced as a forced migration to Cloud SWG. Buyers who do not have a current migration cost map have nothing to compare the new quote against. The desk's job is to produce that map before the renewal conversation begins, so the buyer can negotiate on the basis of the actual alternatives, not the seller's framing.
The DLP work begins with a current usage map. Endpoint DLP, network DLP, discovery DLP and cloud DLP each have separate entitlement definitions. The cross product audit posture has tightened. The desk maps each component against the deployment, identifies the clauses being read more strictly in 2026, and rewrites the contract to match how the buyer actually uses the product, not how the seller's audit team currently classifies it.
The ProxySG work is migration economics. What does Cloud SWG actually cost across a multi region deployment, what does a third party gateway cost as comparison, what does the contract say about the migration window. The buyer who has all three numbers negotiates a different renewal than the buyer who has only the seller's quote.